Challenge The client, a 34 Act reporting company, fell behind on its reporting obligations. As a result of the company’s failure to comply with the required reporting obligations and to meet the reporting obligations’ deadlines, a §12(j) revocation was issued by the...
A client, a citizen of Ireland who’s business was based exclusively in the Ireland. The client desired to enter the United States market in order to grow and expand his business. He had no idea of how US tax situation worked how he could form a US subsidiary.
A client, a citizen of United Kingdom who’s business was based exclusively in the United Kingdom. The client desired to enter the United States market in order to grow and expand his business. He had no idea of how US tax situation worked how he could form a US subsidiary.
Defended a client who was alleged to have purchased a specially manufactured product from a merchant. Plaintiff alleged the defendant entered into an agreement for the provision of this specially manufactured product.
Defended a married couple, domiciled in the State of Minnesota who were sued for $7.2 million in New York Supreme Court by a commercial lender.
Our client, a reputable credit card processing services business, had a default judgment entered against them without proper service and knowledge of the original proceedings filed against them. The client was therefore not represented in the original proceedings filed by the Plaintiff.
I formerly worked as a satellite employee from my home state of New Jersey. I ended my employment with my former employer in 2016. In 2018, I was sued by my former employer for $1.1 million in Illinois State Court. I was referred to Brinen & Associates, LLC by a friend who is a client of the firm. Brinen & Associates, LLC came highly recommended. I contacted Joshua Brinen and then had a consultation at his office with his colleague Mark White. Together, Messrs. Brinen and White explained my options...
